Faculty Author Type

Current Faculty [Natasha Affolder]

Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

2026

Subjects

legal culture, environmental law

Abstract

Lawyers build from templates. Accounts of how law is made rarely mention them. New legislation tends to present itself as original. It is almost never made from scratch. This article makes the hidden process visible. It does so through a study of the near-global spread of environmental impact assessment (EIA) legislation since 1969, using computer-assisted textual similarity analysis to trace what I expected to be identifiable model laws and clear lines of legal inheritance. The search yielded instead a transnational repertoire of legal fragments, repeatedly recombined into new legislative forms across different legal traditions, languages and decades. EIA's legislative spread was bricolage, not cut and paste. The findings sit uneasily with conventional accounts of legal change built around origins, diffusion, and influence: accounts that shaped the inquiry but could not contain its conclusions. Templates travel without attribution, persist without citation and shape legal imagination without being named. They are not simply conduits for legal rules. They establish the defaults from which legal actors work and from which alternatives must struggle to depart. What law can readily see, know and imagine is quietly shaped by the forms through which it is made.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.