Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Environmental law; administrative law; regulation; rule of law; emergency powers; common law constitutionalism
This article argues that environmental issues confront us as an ongoing emergency. The epistemic features of serious environmental issues – the fact that we cannot reliably distinguish ex ante between benign policy choices and choices that may lead to environmental catastrophe – are the same features of an emergency. This means that, like emergencies, environmental issues pose a fundamental challenge for the rule of law: they reveal the necessity of unconstrained executive discretion. Discretion is widely lamented as a fundamental flaw in Canadian environmental law, which undermines both environmental protection and the rule of law itself. Through the conceptual framework of the environmental emergency, this article offers a critique of the current understanding of discretion in environmental law and suggests how an alternative conception of the rule of law can both constitute and constrain the state’s regulative authority over the environment.
Jocelyn Stacey, "The Environmental Emergency and the Legality of Discretion in Environmental Law" ([forthcoming in 2015]) 53:1 Osgoode Hall LJ, Forthcoming; Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20/2015.
NOTE: The "Download" button above will provide access to a working draft, and the "Find in your Library" button below will provide access to the final published version.
Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons