Published In

Review of Law and Economics (forthcoming)

Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

2017

Subjects

selection theory; Priest and Klein; administrative litigation; civil law v. common law; Chinese law; authoritarian legal systems

Abstract

We test the relevance of the selection theory of litigation in a contemporary, civil law setting, using Chinese judicial data that span 25 years regarding lawsuits against government agencies. Civil law systems may be characterized by lower costs of litigation and lower rates of settlement than the U.S. legal system, and therefore the presence of selection effects cannot be assumed. We show that selection effects are indeed manifest in Chinese administrative litigation, and suggest that this may be explained by hidden or intangible litigation costs. Our test for selection effects builds on the approach of previous U.S. studies and potentially allows the identification of selection effects to help improve inferences from decided cases. Finally, we examine patterns of settlement and plaintiff wins in pre-litigation administrative appeals in China, and do not find sufficient evidence for selection effects in this process. This could potentially be explained if most appellees pursuing administrative appeals do not intend to litigate.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS